http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2007-01/26/content_5658311.htm
Now, what is interesting about this story is not that the News Channel for the Wii is being launched on Saturday, though I’ve been waiting for this channel for almost a week now. I’ll mention the interesting bit a little l8er.
For those who don’t know, Nintendo’s new console is weirdly named “Wii”. It’s got a revolutionary control system relying on the remote control’s motion-sensing ability for pointing, swinging, thrusting, etc. This provides a far more intuitive control experience, especially for those who aren’t big gamers, like my wife. :) There aren’t many buttons to deal with on the basic games, with the remote’s ability to sense up, down, left, right, and even forward and back motion providing most of the controls. Furthermore, the remote’s rotation/tilt-sensing abilities are way cool.
The Wii’s main menu consists of a grid with the various boxes containing pictures indicating the program that is stored to each box. These boxes are called “channels”, mimicking television channels - again trying to reflect Nintendo’s aim to get more non-gamers involved in gaming. The News channel has been inoperative since I got my Wii last weekend, and I’ve been wondering when it would go live. (Looks like this Sunday is the live date for the Nes Channel.)
However, the really interesting part of this article was when the writer said:
“The Wii has been a surprise hit for Nintendo in its competition with Sony Corp.’s PlayStation 3 and Microsoft Corp.’s Xbox 360 consoles.”
First off, the XBox 360 retails for $399.99. The Playstation 3 retails for $499.99 for the lower model and $599.99 for the higher model. The Wii? $249.99….Yeah, price alone argues for the success of the Wii. Why the higher cost for the other consoles?
See, there has been a trend in the Video Game Console industry to go with the BIGGEST and the BEST guts in each console. The consoles have continually pushed the limits of what was possible in a console at each iteration of new console. However, there has been a parallel industry in the PC market with PC manufacturers trying to miniaturize powerful components such as graphic cards, processors, power supplies, etc. Most of this has been aimed at the laptop submarket of the PC industry, but the Console manufacturers have been keeping an eye on it, apparently.
All of this brings us to the present, where Microsoft (situated in a unique nexus where they can see the PC market mature as well as the console market advancing) creates the first of the next-gen consoles, the Xbox 360. They packed a LOT of components that were ultimately derived from their PC counterparts into the box of the 360. I LIKE what I see with the 360, but $400 is a little steep for me, considering that I already have a very decent computer.
However, Sony is who made this whole situation STUPID. Sony decided that if an advanced console is rad, an UBER-ADVANCED CONSOLE WILL BE EVEN MORE RADDEREST!!!! So they pack their little black box to the gills with advanced components. An unintended consequence of this idiocy is the fact that the lower-end console costs $500!!!!! The high end goes for $600, and for that you get a FIXED COMPONENT mini-computer. However, what you do NOT get is the ability to upgrade the video card when the existing one becomes obsolete. You can’t upgrade the hard drive when you begin running out of space. You can’t change the processor and motherboard to give yourself more capabilities in a couple years when it becomes worthless. Basically, you’ve bought a very limited-purpose un-upgradeable computer.
People have been saying that the PS3 will be viable for years to come. Those who say that obviously haven’t spent much time around computers. The actual guts of the PS3 will be outdated in months, and obsolete in a couple years. In 2 years, my computer will be far more powerful, and be able to play far better games than the PS3. We’re on the cusp of DirectX10-capable cards. NVidia just released their DX10 cards, which are awesome, and ATI is bound to answer with some great stuff. NVidia’s uber-setup utilizes 2 graphics cards for parallel processing of graphics for an excellent framerate along with a 3rd graphics card dedicated to physics rendering. I don’t care how much the PS3 costs, it can’t compare to that. And it will never have that capability, because you can’t upgrade it. Sure, right now those NVidia cards cost a ridiculous amount, but that won’t always be the case, and you can buy them one at a time, if you like. Anyway, for a console, $600 is just stupid.
Having said all that, the Wii is cool enough to be well worth the $249.99 price of admission. The games that exist already are cool, and I’ve seen trailers for games that will be released, and I’m looking forward to how developers use the unique control capabilities the Wii provides. But anyone who is honest shouldn’t be surprised at the excellent retail performance of the Wii. The cost is far less prohibitive than either of its “competitors”, and it is a great deal of fun for all ages.
Sony is pricing itself out of the market, and from what I’ve read, they lose around $250 on each console they sell. This means that the console is ACTUALLY worth $850 for the high-end model. I’m sure there’s an intelligent reason for it, but it sounds like the bell is tolling for Sony.