Jun 23 2009
Suspected terrorists are able to buy guns…and I’m glad.
Link to the original article: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31494385/ns/us_news-security/
Now, before you all start freaking out about how I want terrorists to buy guns, you need to re-read my post title. That is not what I said, nor is it how I feel. I’ll explain, but you’re going to have to stay with me longer than a single paragraph.
First off, what determines whether someone is or is not a suspected terrorist? According to that article, it would be this list kept by the FBI. So if this list is some sort of master list that contains the people who are suspected of being terrorists, the question must be asked, “How does one make it into this list?” The answer to THAT question explains why I titled this post as I did.
Let me recount for you three incidents:
1. Ron Paul Supporters Are Labeled Potential Terrorists
Yup.
Now, I’m not talking about Glenn Beck calling Ron Paul supporters terrorists. I’m not talking about the Phoenix report that was recirculated claiming that Ron Paul supporters are terrorists. It was Missouri’s Information Analysis Center in a report released in February of 2009 that analyzed into existence the suspicion that someone with a Ron Paul bumper sticker on their vehicle could be a member of the Modern Militia Movement, and thus could be a terrorist. This report was circulated through law enforcement communities, and one can only wonder if anyone new made it onto the secret FBI list because of it. I supported Ron Paul, which I guess makes me a terrorist.
2. Returning Veterans Targeted as potential recruitment targets for right-wing extremist groups by the Department of Homeland Security, April 7, 2009.
“…the return of military veterans facing significant challenges reintegrating into their communities could lead to the potential emergence of terrorist groups…”
I am not quoting that snippet out of context. Read the report here: http://www.fas.org/irp/eprint/rightwing.pdf
Yup…the DHS is basically saying this:
“Thank you for your service, you despicable terrorists.”
Regardless, now returning veterans are suspected of being potential terrorists. How many of them made it onto the secret list?
3. Department of Defense potentially equates protest with low-level terrorist activities.
A multiple choice question on an exam administered by the Department of Defense asked the following:
“Which of the following is an example of low-level terrorism activity?
* Attacking the Pentagon
* [Improvised Explosive Devices]
* Hate crimes against racial groups
* Protests
The correct answer was “Protests”. So, if you’re exercising your right to peaceably assemble, which is guaranteed you by this really obscure document called The Constitution of the United States of America, you could be a low-level terrorist. Regardless of the fact that this test is not directly equating protests with terrorism, it’s definitely saying that any protest COULD be a terrorist act. This is a concerning move, and based on this, *I* could very well be on that secret list.
Now, all of these incidents were THIS YEAR ALONE. I qualify as a potential terrorist in two of those three incidents, and thus I don’t support any move by our government to bar legal citizens who have committed no crime from purchasing firearms based on some list maintained by our government, which has already been shown to have kept people on the list past when they should have been removed: (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/05/06/AR2009050603968.html).
So I definitely DO NOT support any barring of individuals from buying firearms just because they made it onto some list that they can’t see, and can’t even find out if they’re on.

